Is It a Traditional Woman That You Want or a Live-in Employee?
Have they looked into the circumstances behind "traditional women" and how they sustained their families and sanity? Moreover, have they looked into how dear ol grandma kept pop-pop from fathering the entire county, drinking away the bill money, or gambling away the retirement fund?
It always boggles the mind that there is a subset of men that require "modern women" to split all household expenses 50/50 while handling the care and maintenance of the home as a "traditional" (stay-at-home) woman. This is an expectation with or without the solidification of a marriage/solid commitment. 😏😆 Make that make sense!!!!! How does one complain about women today being too independent and/or career/goal oriented while REQUIRING an EQUAL financial split? Then explain how you REQUIRE a woman to match you financially AND take on the role that you fantasize that your grandmother took on in order to "attract and keep" your grandfather.To make it less logical, these red pill heathens also want a modest [in fashion] woman with a low "body count" while desiring the empowered, sexually confident woman.😑
I am guessing that the aspect of the (hefty) amount of "traditional women" that were conditioned to internalizing that coitus was solely for procreation and NOT satisfaction. That their entire personality was to be dutiful homemakers and mothers while having the hobby of moral superiority over other women. These are NOT women that would be within the workforce "hustling like a man" within the patriarchy. They know only to be led and employees of their (respective) religious deities. There is the flipside of that, which are the women (who due to laws of the time) had marriage as the only escape from the clutches of their fathers. Marriage was also the closest that they had to independence. These women were the ones that knew how to swing a cast iron skillet and negotiate a comfortable life as their partners rolled through the harlots at the watering holes in town.
Most importantly... are these men realizing that "traditional men" worked themselves into the grave and the only respect they received was from being distant from their families (emotionally) and living in [virtual] solitude? 😑
Are they collectively forgetting that the only respect from the children of these toxic, barbiturate sustained relationships was due to them being indoctrinated to do so since birth? Are they simply ignoring that many of said men would perish if left to their own devices, yet demanded to be viewed as kings of a kingdom they didn't truly rule? Are we truly allowing subsets of us to be gaslit into a period of time where spousal abuse was the law of the land and women could have little to nothing in their own name for the sake of men having ownership over them for the sake of appearance and keeping men alive and (routinely) emptied of baby batter? 😏 Do we really want to revert to a time when women became well-versed in poisons as a method of securing their peaceful [singular] retirements?The fantasy of the June Cleaver "traditional woman" is just that, a fantasy.
Red pill-addicted men want a live-in employee under the fantasy of a Stepford wife that will porn star perform nightly. That is as plausible as a conservative actually doing research and not lying. 😏 It is time for them to take the advice that is consistently hurled at women... improve yourself and choose better. 💅
Comments
Post a Comment